I wanted to learn other positions, so I was cross trained. I was reliable, my work ethic propelled me forward and I soon became a floor supervisor. With my new title I was now over my cousin and friend. As a supervisor I created work schedules and executed plans and teams to get various jobs done. Eventually the economy took a dip and like so many other companies we felt it. First it was the part timers, and then we had to make more cuts. This is where my moral dilemma comes into play; I had to lay off people.
I had to follow orders from my manager, but I was empathetic to my family and friend. I had to make the decision to lay off my friend or my cousin. I felt like I would be letting someone down. I talked to my manager and asked if the lay offs were necessary, and there were.
I talked to him about possibly making the one full time position two part time positions. There were too many angles to look at and my options were limited. If my friend did stay on and I let go of my cousin my family would be so disappointed in me. Now if I kept my cousin, my cousin would have his position. I need speed if we are cutting our team.
By keeping my cousin my friend would not be able to support his mom. We needed a strong dependable team player. After talking with my manager I decided that this was a no win situation for someone and it had to be done.
I ultimately let go of my friend because I needed reliability. By making this choice I also had to go over things with my cousin about picking up the pace. I explained how we needed to be a fast and efficient team. Life is all about choices. Some are easier than others. We choose what to wear, what to say, where to work. Some choices are not so easy. We have to face the consequences of our actions from the choice that we made.
For the most part, we all want to make morally acceptable choices. But who is to say my morals are better than yours or yours better than his? The point is to find the problem, reflect and commit to an action that fixes the problem. Mrs Birling is a confident and prideful women with some public influence. She thinks that different classes behave a certain way and lacks of empathy-how people live. The Birlings are an upper class family living in pre-war England; they think very highly of themselves and are quite shallow minded.
They concentrate centrally on material possessions. The Birlings live in a well-established and comfortable home, which is richly furnished, yet does not have a hint of homeliness or a sign of family life in it. Throughout the play there are symbols used to Examine and consider religious and ethical responses to animal experimentation One philosopher that strongly is against animal testing is Peter Singer; he became involved after studying the work of Jeremy Bentham.
Abstract Moral pluralism acknowledges the existence of opposing ideas and practices. Moral judgments are determined by using more than one criterion. The views of several moral ethicists are examined and considered. Did Dirty Harry act from free will? He was able to do otherwise but he chose instead to pursue Scorpio, by any means he deemed necessary. Dirty Harry knew he had plenty of alternatives, but he chose to ignore them.
He chose to defy the law he was sworn to uphold and follow and torture Scorpio. Did Dirty Harry intend to act as he did? Dirty Harry intentionally acted as he did. The Operative Assumption of Guilt which means police have to assume that the person they are working with is guilty in order for him to do his job efficiently, unless he knows otherwise.
Worst of all Possible Guilt comes to the conclusion that not only is the assumption of guilt present but the police also believe the suspect is dangerous. The Great Guilty Place Assumption is based on the concept of suspicion. This assumption conforms to the idea that people, places, and now even occasions create epistemic problems. The Not Guilty This Time Assumption is still centered on the idea that a suspect is guilty; however, they may just be innocent that one time.
This is embedded on conscious that sometimes perpetrators get away with things for that moment but ultimately, they are still guilty of some sort of crime, just not at that particular moment. What is the specific moral dilemma that Dirty Harry Problem poses for police officers? Inspector Callahan did not act as a virtuous professional in terms of each of his four professional relationships. The four professional relationships are relationships with the client, the public at large, colleagues, and the profession itself.
Those relationships, if acted upon with integrity, determine a virtuous police officer. Based off those ideas, Inspector Callahan acted as if only the little girl was his client.
He completely neglected his sworn duty of obedience and trustworthiness to the public at large, who are also his clients. He did whatever he could to prove his loyalty to an individual client, the girl.
Inspector Callahan felt obligated to do something to get at Scorpio for shooting his partner. Perhaps, Inspector felt it was his fault for his partner getting shot so; he did what to could to mend that relationship. That probably was the driving force behind catching back to Scorpio. Inspector Callahan could have been thinking, that it could have been him that got shot instead of his partner.
Nevertheless, the virtuous professional would not have reacted in such a manner. The virtuous professional would have trusted the legal system, of which he is a part, to enact justice, though it may take a while to obtain. Lastly, Inspector Callahan took an oath when he received his badge and that was to protect and serve; something that all cops must do even if it means losing their lives.
If he were to just sit back and make no efforts in serving and protecting the people, it would be blatant disrespect to that oath, the badge he wears and the uniform he puts on every day.
Nonetheless, honoring that badge means honoring the law that it represents. Therefore, Inspector Callahan did not act in a virtuous manner when he blatantly disobeyed all the rules related to his profession. Using the aforestated as a guide that aides in the definition of a virtuous professional in terms of seven professional obligations, officer Dirty Harry Callahan, failed to act, maintain and uphold many of his seven professional obligations, and therefore cannot be deemed a virtuous professional.
One of the seven professional obligations of a virtuous professional is competence. The competent police officer knows the Constitution and laws as they apply to her professional practice and their jurisdiction Dreisbach, An officer of the law is to acknowledge a suspects request for an attorney, must follow regulations, statutes, i.
Officer Callahan did not have the right to exact torture on Scorpio to obtain the goal of finding the girl. Officer Callahan therefore failed to uphold his professional obligation of competence.
He did not act as a virtuous professional when being evaluated for competency. Officer Callahan was also lacking in diligence, the second professional obligation of the virtuous professional. With diligence, the professional should make a good effort and take care in fulfilling their agreement with the client Dreisbach, This suspect had the positive right to expect to: Not have his place searched illegally, from cruel and unusual punishment and to obtain due process of the law, starting primarily with obtaining an attorney.
Officer Callahan also negated his agreement with the community and family that he blindly advocated for in his search for the missing girl, because his lack of diligence allowed Scorpio to go free. Officer Callahan gave into temptations to cut corners and instead opted to get the bad guy at all costs. As such, Officer Callahan did not follow the path of the virtuous professional when being evaluated for diligence. The third professional obligation is honesty.
Free moral dilemma papers, essays, and research papers.
Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more. Get started now!
Moral dilemma essay. A moral dilemma entails a choice between two highly conflicting values, where the decision made may result in guilt and remorse. As responders we are able to assess our own values in regards to the character’s actions. Free Essay: Moral Dilemma Everyday we are tested as individuals to make the right choice. How we view ourselves as individuals and how others view us are.
Example essay on Moral Dilemma in Relationships: Have you ever faced a situation in which you feel obliged to take two or more actions (at a time), but then. What is a moral dilemma? A genuine dilemma is one type of moral problem, captured by the expression “You’re damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” That is, in a dilemma, there appears to be no right answer or solution (Dreisbach, ).