Marijuana is one of the substances that has received a lot of attention in the public domain in the recent years. This is because of the debate that it has attracted over its use. Marijuana is one if the illegal substances that is being used by several people for numerous reasons. Some people use the marijuana for recreation, while others use it for medical purposes. There has been a significant number of forces advocating for the legalization of the marijuana.
However, there are other forces that are opposing the efforts to legalize the marijuana because it is perceive to be detrimental to human health.
The use of marijuana should be legalized because it has various medical, economic and social benefits. Limiting the use of marijuana is one of the factors that affects personal freedom in very many ways. This is because people who the substance make their decisions that influence them to use the substance.
The use of marijuana is also perceived to be an activity that is a victimless crime because it is only the person who needs to use it who can get the harms associated with the drug. Therefore, legalization of the substance can assist in giving the person sufficient space and freedom to make the decisions. The laws that are against the use of marijuana ado not have re moral authority to advocate against the substance.
This is because most of the drugs that are legal have more effects on human health the marijuana. For instance, cigarettes are associated with numerous chronic medical conditions and yet it is allowed. The use of alcohol is also associated with a large number of organ malfunctions and health hazards and yet its use is legitimate. Therefore, marijuana is better to in terms of its effects to human body that most of the legal substances and thus its use should be legalized.
Legalization of marijuana can assist in reducing its price and thus promote the economic positions of the users. The high price of the substance is attributed to a numerous number number of factors that include the high risk of the transportation and production. As a result, this is likely to reduce the crimes that are associated with the high prices like theft.
Most of the people who are already addicted to the drug and cannot afford the high funds that are used in purchasing it resort to stealing in order to raise the funds. This early government publication is a comprehensive study about a wide range of marijuana based information.
First, the book argues largely that marijuana is extremely bad for your health and that its addictive nature will only make the user have negative behavior.
Second, there are health repercussions from inhaling smoke and such. Finally, marijuana is said to cause intense social problems because it deters our youth from working and going to school.
This article will be useful because it gives an older comprehensive analysis of marijuana. Tatiana Shohov offers a very thorough background on the historical events regarding the use of medical marijuana.
Shohov offered relevant background information about how much US citizens use it and the federal perspective of this fact. Moreover, she offered a historical analysis of how the DEA and FDA analyzed what kind of drug and under what circumstances it would be acceptable to use. Finally, Shohov described the general implications of using the drug both recreationally and medically.
She referenced other medical professionals and their relevant studies. This source will be useful in going over the background information and literature review for my research paper. This article studied the relationship between marijuana use and cases of cancer. The study that they used was of almost 65, California residents who have cancer and have used marijuana regularly.
The results showed that using medical marijuana did not increase the likelihood of cancer getting worse. Other factors like smoking and alcohol use were also taken into account.
However, the research did suggest that use of marijuana may be associated with exposure to higher levels of risk with those who do not have cancer yet. This article will be useful in analyzing some health related studies regarding the use of medical marijuana. Ultius Blog, 05 Jan. Click here for more help with MLA citations. Click here for more help with APA citations. Click here for more help with CMS citations.
Click here for more help with Turabian citations. Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions and matches customers with highly qualified writers for sample writing, academic editing, and business writing. Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions for consumers around the world. Go to Homepage current My Account my. Core offerings Browse by service type Start your search By selecting a service type. Copied to clipboard Click here for more help with MLA citations.
Copied to clipboard Click here for more help with APA citations. Copied to clipboard Click here for more help with CMS citations. Copied to clipboard Click here for more help with Turabian citations. Rate this blog entry:. View author's profile Show more posts from author. The committee covered thousands of years of the history of marijuana.
In , a Congressionally created commission called the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, whose members were appointed by then-President Richard Nixon, completed one of the most comprehensive reviews ever undertaken regarding marijuana and public policy.
A Signal of Misunderstanding," proclaimed that "from what is now known about the effects of marihuana, its use at the present level does not constitute a major threat to public health," and recommended Congress and state legislatures decriminalize the use and casual distribution of marijuana for personal use.
Another important study was conducted by Dr. Donald Tashkin of the University of California at Los Angeles, a pulmonologist who has studied marijuana for 30 years. This recent study, the largest of its kind, unexpectedly concluded that smoking marijuana, even regularly and heavily, does not lead to lung cancer.
Tashkin indicated that the findings "were against our expectations We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier use What we found instead was no association at all, and even a suggestion of some protective effect.
Although I could go on and on quoting different studies done by well-respected doctors, government appointed committees, etc. In any which way, the effects most definitely do not warrant total prohibition. California's Proposition was the first statewide medical marijuana voter initiative adopted in the USA.
A To ensure that seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes where that medical use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana in the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which marijuana provides relief. B To ensure that patients and their primary care givers who obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the recommendation of a physician are not subject to criminal prosecution or sanction.
C To encourage the federal and state governments to implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of marijuana. Further, Senate Bill which passed on September 20, , was signed by the Governor on October 13, , and which became effective on January 1, , added an Article 2. Among other things, Article 2. Public opinion on the medical value of marijuana has been sharply divided. Some dismiss medical marijuana as a hoax that exploits our natural compassion for the sick; others claim it is a uniquely soothing medicine that has been withheld from patients through regulations based on false claims.
Proponents of both views cite "scientific evidence" to support their views and have expressed those views at the ballot box in recent state elections. This study was supported under Contract No. This report summarizes and analyzes what is known about the medical use of marijuana; it emphasizes evidence-based medicine derived from knowledge and experience informed by rigorous scientific analysis , as opposed to belief-based medicine derived from judgment, intuition, and beliefs untested by rigorous science.
After their nearly two-year review, the investigators affirmed: Except for the harms associated with smoking, the adverse effects of marijuana use are within the range tolerated for other medications. So many people who are ill must resort to using marijuana for medicinal purposes. Many of these people have never used marijuana previously, thereby quelling the theory that the use of marijuana for illness is just an "excuse" to smoke pot.
The list of diseases which cannabis can be used for includes but is not limited to: There are over 60 chemicals in marijuana which may have medical uses. It is relatively easy to extract these into food or beverage, or into some sort of lotion, using butter, fat, oil, or alcohol. One chemical, cannabinol, may be useful to help people who cannot sleep. Another is taken from premature buds and is called cannabidiolic acid.
It is a powerful disinfectant. Marijuana dissolved in rubbing alcohol helps people with the skin disease herpes control their sores, and a salve like this was one of the earliest medical uses for cannabis. The leaves were once used in bandages and a relaxing non-psychoactive herbal tea can be made from small cannabis stems.
As stated before, marijuana is classified by the federal government as a Schedule I drug, a reservation for the most dangerous drugs that have no recognized medical use.
Although many states have legalized medical marijuana, possession, use and cultivation is still illegal on the federal level. There have been past attempts to reclassify marijuana. The government declined to initiate proceedings on the basis of their interpretation of U. The Court ruled against the government and ordered them to process the petition. After continuing to rely on treaty commitments in their interpretation of scheduling related issues concerning the petition a Court decision made it clear that the CSA requires a full scientific and medical evaluation and the fulfillment of the rescheduling process before treaty commitments can be evaluated.
In , Francis L. In his recommendation he stated,. To conclude otherwise, on this record, would be unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious. The second petition was filed by Jon Gettman in It included research and other data that emerged after the record was closed in the prior proceedings before Judge Young and focused primarily on whether cannabis has the high potential for abuse required for Schedule I status.
However, in a federal court denied that petitioners had standing because the petitioners were not injured parties. In , a loosely formed coalition composed of organizations and individuals supporting the reclassification of marijuana known as the Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis submitted a formal rescheduling petition. The purpose of this latest rescheduling petition is to demonstrate through volumes of the latest scientific and medical research that cannabis does not have a high potential for abuse, has a relatively low dependence liability, is safe for use under medical supervision, and has an accepted medical use in the United States.
This petition is still in the works. Many states have not legalized marijuana use for medicinal purposes and, in those states, raising a medical necessity defense may be necessary. The basis necessity defense, also known as the "choice of two evils" was available to those who, when confronted with a serious and immediate threat, found they could save themselves only by taking action that violated a law.
The medical necessity defense was established for marijuana in United States v. Randall FN34 in which a glaucoma patient who smoked marijuana in order to retain his eyesight was found not guilty of violating anti-marijuana law by the District of Columbia Superior Court. Recognizing "the right of an individual to preserve and control his or her body," and observing that "the prohibition of marijuana is not well founded," the court concluded that "the evil the defendant sought to avert, blindness, is greater than that he performed to accomplish it, growing marijuana in his residence in violation of the District of Colombia Code.
Generally, for a successful state necessity defense the defendant must show:
In this paper I will discuss the history of marijuana, the industrial uses of hemp, the prohibition of marijuana, the economical impact prohibition has on America, the effects of marijuana use on the mind and the body, marijuana for medical use, and how legalization of marijuana would have a positive influence on America.
Free marijuana papers, essays, and research papers. The Legalization of Marijuana - Medical marijuana is one of the most controversial subjects in politics.
Although many are against the legalization of marijuana, this paper will argue that the legalization of marijuana is warranted. It will prove this by weighing marijuana’s effects on the body when smoked against the effects on the body when drinking alcohol and smoking tobacco, by presenting research facts on its medicinal qualities, and. Legalizing Marijuana Essay Example Research Paper on Legalizing Marijuana. Nowadays medical and cultural aspects united with each other due to heated discussions dedicated to the use of medical marijuana.
Writing a research paper on legalizing medical marijuana? Read this sample introduction and annotated bibliography to get free peer-reviewed sources on the subject matter5/5(6). A research paper sample on legalize; Writing a research project introduction Legalization of marijuana will assist in eliminating these traffickers and create a good business opportunity for licensed suppliers. Consequently, marijuana should be legalized in order to uphold the integrity to humanity through promoting autonomy to the decision.