Howard Zinn had many opinions of the American Revolution. Howard also justifies his stances and shows how someone could oppose his points.
In the stories John Adams broke the colonists into three different viewpoints of the war. One of the third is in approval, the second is in a opposing, the last is in a neutral state. But not everyone was included so then this became to be known as the United States, at that same time because of the Indians, free slaves, white servant and the free white men were not able to fight.
In the most desperate of time were the poor white men were called into battle. Even then the colonist were not all fighting for the same reasons. Howard Zinn then realizes that patriotism was not sweeping the nation rather then peoples own self agenda.
The struggle between the upper and lower classes was still occurring in the colonies, the lower classes were giving an incentive fight due to the possibility of being able to climb the social pyramid. A lot of people were risking their lives not for their country but themselves. The upper class citizens rarely rushed out into battle fronts, but they sat back comfortably as the lower classes did the colonists dirty work for them.
The lower classes worked to achieve that kind of comfort for themselves. He also justifies his stance by showing how the lower classes worked to get some of the respect they dissevered. How could someone oppose his point? Well one can oppose his points by telling the opposite thing Howard said in the stories. Someone can also oppose his point by proving him wrong, by proving in points wrong too.
The Letters of John and Abigail Adams are a refreshing eye-opener in contrast to the stereotypes and expectations of their day. After reading the correspondence of John and Abigail, a new light is brought upon their relationship and it reveals not only a loving and committed couple, but lets the reader view through a window in an important time in Americas history.
Michael Hiam was born in in Boston. He is a licensed psychologist in New York and Massachusetts, and has authored and coauthored a number scientific article. Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.
He warns us to steer clear of the widespread notion that humans are biologically predisposed to violence and warfare. Zinn starts off by using an arsenal of famous thinkers, pointing out their pessimistic views and believes on human behavior. Views based on no concrete evidence that we humans are born with this trait called violence. Zinn add great minds such as Einstein and Freud and their correspondence to illustrate their own views on the subject, and their conclusions that humans are violent by nature.
Other scholars are also thrown in to support this traditional view of human nature being evil. Howard picks on some scientific fields to show as that there is no evidence of human instinct for the kind of aggressive hostility that characterizes war. He turns to sociobiology, where the Harvard professor E. Wilson goes on to describe that humans are born with such a trait as violence, that we own it to our genes.
Zinn is starting to show us an interesting pattern, a blueprint that clearly show us that every explanation from those important people look to root their selves with evidence found only in History. Zinn invites us to illustrate why History is being picked as the field from where those people can pull their evidence of Human violence. Zinn shows us that there is a down side of it picking on history, because it depends on which historical events you examine to be in your favor.
Zinn goes on to convince us that our concentration get deflected by the real cause of violence and war. Zinn uses the international conference of scientists in Spain to express their conclusion on the question of human nature and violent aggression, to lure as to the very point of the whole essay that society has the power to harness this violent instinct in humans, and not our biological makeup.
To further straighten his observation, Zinn uses the well-known Milgram experiment. In sum, carefully controlled experiments demonstrate that we follow others more often than we might like to think. We are more likely to conform when authority figures are close by, and are more likely to express our individuality and dissent when the consequences of our actions are more apparent. Also from the area of anthropology Zinn uses the two tribes of The Forest People and The Mountain People from the studies of Colin Turnbull, to show us what an impact can an out side disturbance have on one tribe, which brought out a violent behavior in them.
- Howard Zinn: On History by Howard Zinn () is a collection of previously published essays ranging from Freedom Schools in the s, issues in scholarship, to the American Empire. Even though the essays were written over several decades there is a constant .
Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on Howard Zinn.
Howard Zinn was born on December 7 in Brooklyn New York. Zinn was raised in a working-class family in Brooklyn, and flew bombing missions for the United States in World War 2, which experience he uses to shape his opposition to war. Free Essay: Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress by Howard Zinn Posted on October 13, by dandelionsalad by Howard Zinn Featured Writer Dandelion.
Read this essay on Howard Zinn. Come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays. Get the knowledge you need in order to pass your classes and more. Only at fast-tri-29.cf". Free Essay: What is Gordon S. Wood’s argument and what is Howard Zinn’s argument on the nature of the American War for Independence and what evidence do the.